No Neutral Space
A Collective Refusal of Ahoy’s Militarized Venue
- Open Letter to Mondriaan Fund
(Dutch version of letter is underway!)
If Prospects, a centrepiece of Art Rotterdam, is a fair dedicated to young, emerging and diverse artists, then what does it mean to hold this celebrative cultural occasion in a venue that hosts the Netherlands Defence and Security Exhibition (NEDS), an arms fair that is integral to the global weapons trade?
This is not an abstract question. Instead it is a timely question that has increased in urgency in the past two years, where we have witnessed the Israeli state use advanced military technology to commit a live-streamed genocide in Gaza1 with financial and military support from Western countries2. This ethnic cleansing campaign, marked by repeated war crimes and crimes against humanity, relies on weapons and systems from companies like Elbit Systems and Lockheed Martin3, firms that have exhibited at NEDS in Ahoy until this year4. These same companies are also complicit in causing militarised brutality to the people of the Global Majority across the world5. While Israeli companies may be excluded this year from NEDS, Ahoy’s structural complicity remains6. It will continue to be a marketplace for the militarised economy that enables the killing of civilians in endless exploitative wars aided and abetted by our governments.
To display our art in such a space is to be implicated in its machinery. The cultural events at Ahoy are a form of artwashing7: they provide a mask of legitimacy to a venue that profits from and normalises the arms trade. We are witnessing the increased militarisation of our society, where public infrastructure has become a stage for war profiteers, while our social, cultural and health services are insistently being eroded. We are witnessing cultural institutions like Mondriaan Fund partake in artwashing without a hitch of critique and within the same cultural spaces that claim to celebrate freedom, creativity and criticality, we see genocide diminished to a matter of “personal opinion.” This is not a neutral act. It is a political act that masks the Western military responsibility for the insurmountable killing of people of the Global Majority and the irreversible destruction of all life on the Earth.
The Role of the Mondriaan Fund
Unlike private funding bodies, the Mondriaan Fund, as a public institution funded by taxpayers8, is a source of support with little to no strings attached, and therefore a safer option for many artists. Yet by hosting Prospects at Ahoy, the Fund forces emerging artists into an impossible and unethical bind: legitimise a venue that enables war and genocide, or sacrifice the visibility and opportunity the fund itself is meant to provide.
In its new 2025–2028 direction the Mondriaan Fund claims to go “beyond the centre, beyond the norm,” where it will be “facilitating and strengthening the dialogue between the public, institute and creator9.” We insist that our refusal to normalise the entanglement of the art market and war industry is an active practice of the Fund’s new direction of going beyond the norm.
Reflecting on the Fund’s stated commitment to “champion a diverse and resilient visual arts and cultural heritage sector10,” we ask: what does it say about our cultural present if the art market is so tightly entangled to the war industry that artists’ “only choice” is to partake in its profits? Is this the legacy the Mondriaan Fund wishes to create for emerging artists, one that begins with complicity?